A Miscellany of Projects - Gaming, SCA Combat, Arts & Sciences, and Travel

Just as with loyalty, which was my first focus, it was difficult at first to find an example of diligence transformed from virtue to vice.  As it happens, my current audiobook is Barbara Tuchman's The Guns of August , about the first month of the First World War.  That's where today's post came from. Prussia in the age of Frederick the Great was called "an army with a state."  Of course, Napoleon handily demonstrated that that army, untethered from the genius of Frederick, was about the same as any other Napoleonic-era military force (a lesson that France should've taken note of - elan  is insufficient by itself!).  As a reaction to this, a series of reformers in the late-Napoleonic period, most notably including Clausewitz and Scharnhorst, professionalized the officer class in much the same way that the Royal Navy professionalized over the 18th Century.  Their reforms included an emphasis on staff work and planning, and the creation of a war-plans division. 

It would be easy to conclude, based on my posts so far, that "virtue" is all a matter of men and arms, and that it is specifically devoted to various approaches to combat.  Nothing could be further from the truth; despite its Latin roots, virtue sees no gender, no sex, no race, no creed, no color, no profession, and no calling.  It is different things in different times and places, but anyone can practice it. As an example, I offer Heloise, of the Abbey of Paraclet, who has the distinction of being better-known as part of a tragic romance than on her own.  The male half of said romance, Pierre Abelard, would have been better-served by being a theater kid in another century, so fond was he of dramatic scenes.  One can almost hear the emo-kid eyeshadow in quotes like "Logic has made me hated in the world."  In comparison, Heloise, who enters history first as a teenager, is remarkable not because of her love of drama, though there are plenty of dramatic lines to Heloi

As I discussed indirectly in the cases of William Marshal and Yamamoto Tsunetomo, there is a correlation between being well-rounded and being virtuous.  It is not causation; it is possible to be a well-rounded scoundrel, as, for instance, Gilles de Rais.  However, being a jack of all trades, and master of at least one, is a good way to stand out from the pack.  It should be at least an entertaining exercise to highlight what someone does best, because there should be multiple reasonable choices. So it is with Yagyû Munenori , who was the personal sword instructor and advisor to three generations of Tokugawa shoguns, Ieyasu , Hidetada , and Iemitsu .  He was the head of the Edo line of Yagyû shinkage-ryû and author of what could be described as its school text, the Heihô Kadensho , which has a singular advantage over the better known Book of Five Rings , in that Munenori also gave a series of drawings illustrating his school to an actor with whom he was especially impressed.  It's

When I started this series, one of the points I raised was that virtue carried too far becomes vice.  It is difficult to find a good example of how loyalty carried too far becomes a vice; we typically find reasons that a person who carried their loyalty too far was acting for some other  reason, such as with the German army hiding behind the "sacred honor of the German soldier" and the fact that the influencers of the German army generally agreed  with Hitler or at the very least did not find him objectionable, but were more concerned with his incompetence.  They were not holding their noses and doing it out of professional loyalty, they were doing it out of self-interest from beginning to end. Instead, I will consider a man who carried expressions of loyalty to such extremes that they became absurd and weakened his credibility.  That man is Yamamoto Tsunetomo, subject of Hagakure.   We know relatively little about the man outside of that book, so the book deserves some discu

As with most of the figures I have discussed so far in this series of posts, it is very difficult to assemble an accurate picture of Minamoto no Yoshitsune; one might reasonably describe him as in the same company as Arthur and Roland in terms of historicity.  There's something clearly there , but exactly what is subject to vigorous debate.  What we know is that the man existed, that he was an influential figure in his time, and that his memory was strong enough to pull even the most extravagant tales to attach themselves to him - raised by goblins, capable of impossible feats of grace and swordsmanship, loyal to his brother beyond all reason. Minamoto no Yoshitsune.  Not shown: Bishounen. Let us first set the man in his place.  In the middle of the twelfth century, Japan was not so much a country as a loose grouping of families bound together by a reverence for the imperial line.  Simplifying things tremendously, a shift between the old court aristocracy and the imperial family o

The gentleman on the left, observing the Oath, just wants to be done with the whole sworded affair. In some stories, such as that of William Marshal, telling how much of his legacy is the product of friendly chroniclers, and how much is the truth, is difficult.  This is not one of those stories.  This is, instead, the story of an event that almost certainly never happened, but has become its own sort of cultural touchstone. That event is the Peach Garden Oath, which brings together the hero and his two main supporters in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms.   Before discussing the fictional version, one must separate the Romance from the very similarly titled Records of the Three Kingdoms .  The Records was a respectable historical work, written very shortly after the reunification of the titular three kingdoms from primary documents, and was a scholarly work that included both moral lessons and strict recollection of facts.  It can be thought of, broadly, as a parallel to Plutarch

For the first of these posts, on a thoroughly appropriate day, I am taking a very easy subject: William Marshal , first Earl of Pembroke, known in his lifetime (as was Charny) as the greatest knight who ever lived.  Marshal lived from about 1147 to May 14, 1219, served five kings - three of them named Henry, and one of them generally all but forgotten today - was the one man who is known ever to have unhorsed Richard the Lionheart, was one of the four men that same worthy trusted to govern England while on Crusade, and was one of the prime negotiators on Magna Carta. Effigy of William Marshal.  No jokes here. With such an impressive life, it is easy to forget that William Marshal was, for all intents and purposes, a mercenary.  The difference between Marshal and other, equally influential men who were equally hungry for rewards, lands, and honors is that Marshal could not be bought twice.  This drew him praise in his own time; what, therefore, were the assumed virtues of

It's been on my mind recently that we aren't great at accepting our heroes.  There's a story in Plutarch's Parallel Lives about Aristides , an Athenian politician and general who was nicknamed "the Just" in his own lifetime, who was out walking and came across an old farmer trying to cast his vote in the annual ritual known as ostracism, where a single citizen of Athens could be exiled for ten years if six thousand Athenians voted for their exile.  The farmer was illiterate, and asked for Aristides to help him write his vote... for Aristides.  When Aristides asked why, or if Aristides had somehow wronged him, the farmer simply said it irritated him to hear Aristides constantly referred to as "the Just."  Aristides scratched his name on the potsherd, and went on his way. This illustrates quite well that we've enjoyed taking popular figures down a peg for a very long time - it is older than feudalism . It's also not a peculiarly European phen

  Earlier this week , I discussed the first round of ice mead results.  Since then I've had a chance to test an easier-to-process method than doing it in a bottle. Procedure The procedure is mostly unmodified.  Since it was the exact same batch as the previous procedure, brewing method was exactly the same. Modifications to Previous Procedure - Apparatus Instead of a 750mL bottle, I used a one-gallon square ice cream bucket.  The square bucket was used to allow easy pour-off when the time came, and because storage of a square bucket in a freezer is an economic use of space. Modifications to Previous Procedure - Materials. I used approximately half a gallon (approx. 2000mL), eyeball measure only, of bochet as a test volume, instead of a 750mL bottle.  This was based on the very small pour-off results from the first batch; I wanted sufficient volume to produce measurable results, instead of the tablespoon of ice mead created the first time. Modifications to Previous Procedure - Check

A couple weeks ago, I posted about the first batch of '21 for brewing.  There isn't a lot to give in terms of update there, except that I ran my bochet past my parents, who aren't mead drinkers, and they liked it.  I pulled a 750mL bottle of the bochet two days ago and put it in the outdoor freezer to see what would happen.  More on that in a moment. Background Before I go any further, I am going to preface this by saying that there are some non-technical general terms I'm going to use that require definitions for my purposes.  "Beer-strength" indicates an alcoholic beverage between 4% and 10% alcohol by volume (ABV).  "Wine-strength" is 10-20% ABV.  "Spirit" is 20% ABV or stronger.  This differs from convention in that I am not separating spirits and liqueurs. Freezing distillation is a historically documentable method for increasing effective alcohol concentration; while distillation as a means of improving alcohol content is traceable t